i.
Drafts
Kindred reads the clinical assessments and drafts the PLP in your school's template. Clinical jargon becomes language teachers can use and parents can read.
Outputs: parent-PLP.docx · audit companion
For Australian schools
and the kids they serve
PLPs drafted from the evidence already in the file.
Kindred reads the clinical assessments and drafts the Personalised Learning Plan. Your Inclusion Leader edits and approves. Nobody writes fifty PLPs from scratch.
Hours
spent reading clinical reports for every PLP.
$25,000
of NCCD loading on the line for each student, each year.
Fifty+
students on an Inclusion Leader's books in a year.
Clinical reports are written for clinicians. PLPs have to work for teachers and read for parents.
Someone reads all of it. Usually the Inclusion Leader. They turn clinical jargon into classroom adjustments and write a plan parents can understand. Fifty times a year.
The translation gap is not a failure of care. It is a failure of time.
Observation i
The translation gap
Teachers without specialist training are asked to interpret psychology, speech, and OT reports and turn them into classroom adjustments. PLPs vary in quality because time does, not because care does.
Observation ii
What's already out there
Junipa, ezNCCD, Tes, Inspire. They store documents and run dashboards. None of them read the clinical evidence and draft the plan. That part still lands on one person.
Three jobs, one workflow. Drafts, cites, and evolves.
A PLP is not a one-shot artefact. It lives for the school year and passes to next year's teacher. Kindred treats it that way.
ii.
Cites
Every claim points back to its source document. Anything Kindred cannot substantiate is removed before the plan is exported. Your IL knows where every sentence came from.
Mechanism: source-traceable claims
iii.
Evolves
Next year's teacher inherits the plan, not a blank document. Your IL's edits carry forward. New evidence joins the file. The PLP grows with the student.
Carry-forward: edits persist · newest data wins
Four steps from a folder of assessments to a parent-ready PLP.
The Inclusion Leader stays in the loop at every step. The AI drafts. A person approves.
Step 01
01
Upload the clinical evidence
The neuropsych report, the speech pathology assessment, the OT review. Whatever is in the student's file. Kindred parses PDFs, DOCX, and scanned documents.
Step 02
02
Identifying details are stripped
Personally identifiable information is removed before any AI processing happens. Names, dates of birth, family details, addresses. The AI never sees them.
Step 03
03
Kindred drafts the PLP
Strengths, adjustments, goals, classroom strategies. Every clinical claim points back to a source document. Anything Kindred cannot substantiate is cut before export.
Step 04
04
Your IL reviews and approves
Your Inclusion Leader edits the draft inline. You get a parent-ready .docx and an audit companion. New evidence next term joins the next version. Edits stay.
"Our son is nine. He has ASD and ADHD and is on NCCD."
I. The parent
Our son is nine. He has ASD and ADHD and is on NCCD. As parents we have been frustrated by how generic PLPs and adjustments can be. The clinical detail is there in the assessments. It just does not make it through to the plan.
This is not a criticism of teachers. They are busy and they have a lot of these to do. There has to be a better way.
II. The business analyst
My wife is an Inclusion Leader. I watched her spend hours on Year 7 PLPs. Assessments are technical. Documentation is scattered. Before you can write the plan you have to read every piece of evidence in the file.
It takes a long time. My mind went straight to root cause.
— Sam Murdoch
Founder, Kindred · Melbourne
No identifying student data leaves your school.
Today, teachers are pasting clinical reports into ChatGPT to get this work done. That is the status quo Kindred replaces. Kindred is a different category of risk.
i.
No identifying detail reaches the AI
Personally identifiable information is removed before any AI processing happens. The model never sees the student.
ii.
Every claim has a source
Every clinical statement in a Kindred PLP traces back to a document in the student's file. The IL knows where every sentence came from.
iii.
Nothing the AI invents survives export
If Kindred cannot substantiate a claim against a source document, that claim is removed before the .docx leaves the system.
iv.
Pseudonymous audit trail
Generations, edits, versions, downloads. All logged with pseudonymous IDs. Personal information never appears in the log.
v.
Per-school isolation
Your school has its own login and its own template. Student data is never pooled with other schools.
vi.
Australian, NCCD-aligned
Built in Melbourne. Designed against the Victorian DET position on AI, the ST4S AI module, and the National AI in Schools Framework.
Pilot one is running with a Melbourne primary school. Expressions of interest are open for Term 3.
Kindred runs in the browser. Your IL signs in, uploads the file, reviews the draft. No on-site server. No IT install.
Item i
Web app, no install
Schools sign in. Your IT department is not asked to host or maintain anything.
Item ii
Your template, your house style
Bring your school's PLP template. We mark it up once. Every draft after that comes back in your house style.
Item iii
Pilot terms upfront
Pilot one is gift-priced in exchange for written feedback and a reference. Pricing after that is per-user, validated with the pilot school. No lock-in.
If you are an Inclusion Leader, principal, or business manager at an Australian school and want to talk about a pilot or an early look, the form below comes straight to me.
Tell me about your school.
Send a note. I reply personally, usually same day. If you want to see Kindred work on a real assessment, say so. I'll set up a private demo.